Week 7 Workshop – Viral Media Spoof Ideas

The task for this workshop is to get people to believe something that is not true

You could create one of the following:

  • A fake news story- based on the work you were doing last week
  • A spoof based around a factual event taken to illogical extremes
  • A fake advert for a product
  • A fake event- recreate history
  • Or anything else that you feel will help to spread an idea
If you are stuck have a think about past events, local, national or international. What would have happened if things were different? How could you fabricate a story, to an alternative outcome, to re-create history. Stage a news broadcast, documentary, or short film, about your event.

Guest Workshop: Comedy, Satire and Change with James Cook, Comedian

jamescook

In this talk comedian James Cook explores the role of comedy as a part of public debate, as well as taking a look through how comedy has responded and reacted to politics and issues in society. He also talks through a few useful techniques to get you thinking about using comedy in your creative work.

You can find out more about James by following him on Twitter or check out the News With Jokes podcast series that he has created.

Here are the notes from the talk.

So we’ve heard that ideas change the world and that humour is an effective way to express an idea – so what if you had a political or social idea? How would you use humour to get that across?

When that happens it’s called ‘satire’- the holding up of vices, abuses and shortcomings to ridicule with the aim of shaming society and individuals into improvement.

In certain Native American cultures, there exists a role in society for part-shaman part-clown figures whose job is to ridicule everyone within their tribe, from the elders and chiefs to the little kids. It is agreed that this is their role, so no-one gets offended.

In the Hopi tribe, the ‘clown’ draws a circle on the ground and when inside the circle, they are given free rein to be as offensive as they like.

In our society, we have comedians who fulfil a similar role. Instead of drawing a circle on the ground, we have comedy clubs – where audience buy into the idea that anything and everything is fair game for ridicule.

The tools of satire…

Sarcasm –Saying something in such a way so that the viewer or reader understands that you don’t really mean it. ‘David Cameron is a REALLY good Prime Minister’

Parody – Mocking through impersonation, making the ‘subject’ (whether it’s a person, an institution or an idea) look ridiculous. In this example, The Day Today mocks US style news reports and the death penalty http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO9jGsgPTsk

Exaggeration – overstating the case to emphasise your point.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8v4adCJ0dM&feature=related

Juxtaposition – Take two seemingly unconnected ideas and put them together ‘what if x did y?’ For example, what if Ninjas had a parade? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49fVYmO3yv0&feature=fvsr

Comparison – Likening the subject to something else, usually in an unflattering way – but not always, sometimes to something unexpected or ridiculous. For example, Oprah Winfrey is like an Egyptian Pharoah.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkQBl-3t5sg

The Satire Boom!

In 1960, four recent Oxbridge graduates wrote and performed in a comedy sketch show called ‘Beyond the Fringe’ in London’s glamorous West End.

What was controversial about this show was that in it one of the performers, Peter Cook, did an impersonation of the then Prime Minister Harold MacMillan. And this had never been done on stage in Britain before. People would come from far and wide to see this amazing thing. Someone doing an impression of the actual Prime Minister live on stage.

And it wasn’t a flattering portrayal, Cook’s MacMillan was an elderly senile posh idiot way out of touch with reality. But this struck a chord with the public, because they thought that MacMillan WAS an elderly senile posh idiot way out of touch with reality.

The stage show led indirectly to the establishment of The Establishment Club, a nightclub in London where satirical revues were performed and every sacred cow was lampooned, from the army, to royalty, to politicians to the judiciary.

In 1961, part funded by Peter Cook, the satirical magazine Private Eye was founded, with the aim to mock the powerful, and in 1962 That Was The Week That Was – Britain’s first satirical television program went on air on BBC1 – at a time when there were only 2 television channels. Live on Saturday night TV, the members of the Conservative government were insulted – and sure enough in 1964 – Labour won the general election.

Satire had defeated the elderly, senile, posh, out of touch Tories.

Conclusive proof of the effectiveness of satire to change the world.

OR

The Conservatives had been in power for 13 years, which is usually when the electorate starts looking for alternatives.
AND they’d been rocked by the Profumo Affair
AND the ‘bounce’ being enjoyed by the recently elected leader of the Labour Party – Harold Wilson.

All of which would have happened had there been a ‘satire boom’ or not.

The Labour Party ‘won’ that election with a majority of 4.

A similar thing happened in the 80s. Margaret Thatcher and the Conservatives were the victims of satirical attacks from a new breed of exciting comedic talent. The likes of Ben Elton led the charge which started in the clubs of London and ended up on mainstream television.

Thatcher won three landslides, and was ultimately deposed by her own party – who then went on to win another election.

In 2011 Private Eye celebrated their 50th birthday. This was their front cover.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-snKk_lBC_Gs/TqkA3_z7EfI/AAAAAAAACjc/V1t1LMGaXl8/s1600/private%20eye%20happy%20birthday.jpg

So there you go – satire doesn’t work. But if satire doesn’t work, why do totalitarian regimes ban it?

Dario Fo once said:
“REAL satire causes outrage. The more they try and stop you – the better job you are doing”

So maybe REAL satire what causes outrage, like the 2001 Brass Eye Paedophile Special…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlEcGHxfltE

Among the press coverage of this ‘sick’ show, was this article in the Daily Star. Conveniently next to an article which featured the then 15 year old Charlotte Church…

http://screenagers.me/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/chestswell.jpg

Spitting Image was a television program that started in 1984 on ITV on Sunday nights, a mainstream station at a peak viewing time. The show consisted of comedy sketches performed by caricaturised latex puppets of the notable people of the day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhdHO5_HSQQ

In just 27 years we’d gone from no-one having ever impersonated the Prime Minister before, to the Prime Minister is a face eating alien. And that was 26 years ago – where can you go from there?

And what is the satirical point of that sketch? Which one of Thatcher’s policy is being lampooned?

Isn’t it ‘teasing’ rather than satire?

Teasing would be saying something like ‘David Cameron’s got a big face’, whereas satire would be to mock one of his policies. Which one do you think works best in front of a live audience?

I asked around a bunch of professional comedians and no-one can really remember the last time they saw anyone doing any political satire in their club sets. Why not? Is it that audiences don’t laugh as much at satire? Is it that audiences don’t want to hear it? Or is it that comedians are lazy?

Back in the early 60s Harold MacMillan went to see Peter Cook do the impression of him, and took it in ‘good humour’ and when the Home Secretary wanted to ban That Was The Week,  MacMillan said no. It is better to be ridiculed than ignored.

As can be seen in the rise to fame of Boris Johnson. An obscure opposition MP and former magazine editor, he achieved national notoriety for his appearances on Have I Got News For You. Often appearing as a bumbling fool. Here he is hosting in 2003. http://fliiby.com/file/704033/suwyq0twtf.html

He went on to be the Mayor of London.

With two weeks to go before the 2008 US election, both candidates did a ‘stand-up comedy routine’ at a dinner in New York City.  Here’s Obama (although McCain’s is probably funnier)  http://youtu.be/OSU-qAdcuyI

So now politicians are drawing a circle on the ground…

There is no evidence that any specific satirical piece, whether a book, a TV show, a film… has had any impact on specific political outcomes, although a healthy part of democracy is a population that questions, scrutinizes and in some cases, takes the piss, out of those in authority.

So it could be argued that satire’s REAL purpose is creating a culture where authority figures are questioned, which would be why there’s no North Korean Have I Got News For You.

Week Four Workshop – Empathy and Point of View

1. Researching other people’s points of view

For the first part of todays workshop we want you to go out into the streets with a camera and ask people some questions related to your creative activism work so far. The aim of this is to get to understand other people’s point of views, so that they can help to shape the way you need to construct your messages in order for them to be listened to.

You should aim to ask at least 5 people about their view on a particular topic related to your Creative Activism work that you have carried out so far. If possible it would be good to ask a diverse group of people so that you can get a range of viewpoints.

We will work on these questions during the workshop.

2. Creating Empathy- Putting yourself into your work

For the second part of the workshop we will be exploring how you can use empathy in your work.

Many filmmakers, in order to tell their stories in more compelling ways, understand the importance of empathy in their work- the capacity to recognize and share feelings that are being experienced by others. This can be a very powerful tool for filmmakers to tell stories with, experiencing the point of view of another person (or being) as a means to encourage audiences to feel compassion with a particular subject position. This can also an important part of your research- as being embodied in a subject, and putting yourself into someone else’s shoes, can help to shape your perspective on it. Lets look at a few examples:

Super Size Me (2004) – Morgan Spurlock uses his own body as a part of his research in this award winning documentary examining the fast-food industry. Also see ’30 Days’ (where he spent 30 days living in someone elses shoes exploring issues such as: the minimum wage, being in prison, a christian living as a muslim)

Erasing David (2010) – David Bond uses a similar technique in this film that examines privacy, surveillance and the database state

Living Without Money (2011) shows the life of 68 year old Heidemarie Schwermer, a German woman who made a deliberate choice to stop using money 14 years ago (and here’s a similar article on Mark Boyle, an environmental journalist, who carried out a similar experiment on himself in 2009).

A similar documentary was ‘No Impact Man’ (2009) – following Colin Beavan and Michelle Conlin as they plan to live a year creating as little ecological impact as possible:

Other films that use these techniques include Living with the Amish (Channel 4) – where UK teens live the lives of Amish people in the states.  and Superskinny Me: The Race to Size Zero (Channel 4) – where the filmmakers went on a range of crash diets over 6 weeks.

For the rest of this workshop we want you to consider how you can use point of view and empathy to create a short documentary project on one of the subject areas you are pursuing as part of your creative activism work. You should consider the following questions:

  1. How could documentary be used to enlighten people about my area of creative activism?
  2. What points of view/subject positions could I take to tell my story in an empathetic way?
  3. Could I use myself, by carrying out an action/experimenting/embodying someone elses perspective, to enlighten people about an issue I am trying to promote.
Based on this we then want you to look at this weeks task- Challenge 5 – Documentary Task.

Week Three Workshop- Allegory, Metaphor and Juxtaposition

This weeks workshop is based around coming up with your ideas for your Chellenge 4 Remix and Subversion.

Three useful words to think about during this workshop, and for your task, are:

Allegory a representation of an abstract or spiritual meaning through concrete or material forms; figurative treatment of one subject under the guise of another.

Metaphor a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable in order to suggest a resemblance. Or something used, or regarded as being used, to represent something else; emblem; symbol.

Juxtaposition an act or instance of placing close together or side by side,especially for comparison or contrast.

Here’s some links to get you thinking around what you could do. If you find any more good ones please add the links in the comments below:

Subversive and Political Remix Video Blog has some great inspiration

I am not moving – Hilary Clinton/Obama Speech about the Arab Spring Mashup

Imagine This – Bush Singing Imagine by John Lennon

Apple Phone Story, Also see this request from Duke Students asking Apple to make their products conflict free and this Guardian Article on Making a Conflict Free iPhone. Further links about Apple include this recent report on their manufacturing in China and this on a groups criticism on their environmental record . Here’s a response to some of this on the Apple Site and check out The Darkside of the iPhone

Tesco Sausage ad pulled after complaints -

Wikileaks Mastercard Parody - In protest of mastercard effectively setting up a financial blockade to the site

the Chevrolet Tahoe campaign that got remixed - and here’s some examples of the videos (Example OneExample Two Example Three )

VW Darkside Campaign and Competition by Greenpeace

Kentucky Fried Cruelty

McSpotlight McDonalds Parody Game

GoogleWatch Google Beast File

Info on the Mouse liberation front Fairy Use tale Disney Remix

An interesting Media Hoax on Urban Foxhunting 

Reading:

Here are some useful articles on Remix and Political Protest

 

 

Week Two Workshop – Playboy

Playboy Stationery – Case Study Workshop by creativact

What’s this?

…and what does it represent?

It’s Playboy, you’ve heard of Playboy right?

Entertainment for Men” The Website states… ‘Find hundreds of sexy girls posing nude for Playboy including Playmates. AccessPlayboy magazine articles, sexy women and hot girls in photo galleries.

The bunny brand and it’s playful logo has been breading like… oh what’s the phrase?  Dunno, an over sexed mammal though. What do we think about Playboy?

And what’s the link with…

…The nations favourite High Street Newsagent and Stationers.

WH Smith hit the headlines in June 2005 for stocking Playboy branded Stationary. Such as this stylish pencil case.

And these delightful notepads…

Back to school…

…at the Playboy Mansion But not just WHSmith and not just Stationary.

Impzz_09675v136vhytpricerighthome.com
Bedtime just got got stylish with this duvet cover and pillow case set
Kelly. T from Portsmouth on 11/02/2011
This is a really sweet duvet cover. My 13 year old daughter wanted some Playboy items and I wasn’t really happy getting them as I don’t think the brand is suitable for young girls. But this duvet was really nice and tasteful so I didn’t mind getting it. So now we’re both happy. Thank you PriceRightHome!

Thanks for that Kelly from Portsmouth.  Stylish?  Tasteful?  www.playboy.com real tasteful…

The Playboy strap-line is “Entertainment for Men”  But the Bunny Logo is being sold to girls and young women.  On the High Street, in Smiths.

But it’s just a logo, a symbol.  There’s nothing pornographic about a bunny in a bow-tie.

        But what does the logo symbolise?

Here’s how to draw the bunny.

Hugh Hefner with his fiancee Crystal Harris.

Hugh Hefner with his former fiancee Crystal Harris. Photograph: Angela Weiss/Getty Images

In an interview in 1967, Hugh Hefner, founder of the Playboy empire, explained the ways in which women were like rabbits. The bunny “has a sexual meaning”, he said, “because it’s a fresh animal, shy, vivacious, jumping – sexy.  First it smells you, then it escapes, then it comes back, and you feel like caressing it, playing with it.  A girl resembles a bunny. “

Not to forget the phrase “At it like rabbits.” 

Back to the High Street Stationers.

In June 2005 Schoolgirls in Croydon staged a protest outside the Smiths on Croydon High St asking passers by to sign a petition calling for all Playboy branded items to bebanned.

 ”The protesters, ranging in age from 11-15, from Coloma convent girls’ school”. - Guardian Aug ’05 Teacher ”Eleanor Kirwan saw the Playboy stationery range next to Disney and Winnie the Pooh in WHSmith and in her classroom, she reckoned her pupils deserved to know exactly what they’d been sold.  Companies must take social responsibility into account as well. Our argument is that they are simply prioritising financial gain over the moral offensiveness of using children to sell sex. I merely accompanied the pupils to their picket. They were present because they had made an informed and passionate choice.”

By placing the bunny logo on school equipment, underage children are seduced into buying into the pornographic brand – an adult, top-shelf brand that sells women as sexual commodities. But WHSmith denies that Playboy means porn.

Playboy is probably one of the most popular ranges we’ve ever sold,” says head of media relations for WHSmith, Louise Evans. “It outsells all the other big brands in stationery, like Withit [a range of cute cartoon animals], by a staggering amount. That should give you an idea of how popular the brand is. We offer customers choice. We’re not here to act as a moral censor.”   - Guardian Aug ’05

So at who’s feet does the responsibility fall?

  • Children for purchasing the pencil case?
  • Their parents for not properly informing them about Playboy?
  • WH Smiths for supplying and promoting the product?
  • Society for making the range ‘Fashionable’?
  • Playboy for producing the product in the first place?

The pressure group Object,  also campaigned against the WHSmith’s promotion of the Playboy brand to children, says:

Playboy’s logo clearly represents pornography. The magazine routinely features sexualised and full-frontal images of naked young women. It also promotes pornographic videos and strip shows. Playboy is about men buying women and presents this as natural and normal male behaviour. WHSmith is therefore endorsing pornography to young, impressionable and possibly underage girls.”

There’s a fear that this steers society towards a growing acceptance of the sexualisation of children.  Like this.

The campaign against WH Smiths  and other retailers stocking the stationary continued.

Vicars were getting involved, taking direct action – he cleared the shelf of all the Playboy products, moving them to another part of the store.

 The Reverend Tim Jones accused the soft porn empire of “cynical and wicked commercial exploitation”.

Bloggers produced campaign resources, intended for more direct action.

playboycompliments

playboy_leaflet

“I like the brand because it’s posh,” explains 14-year-old Tatiana. “It makes you feel like you’re worth something.” When I ask her if she knows what the bunny logo means, she giggles and says, “It’s porn innit? But people don’t think it’s porn. They think it looks nice.”   - Guardian Aug ’05

Three and a half years after that protest on the Croydon High Street WH Smith ditch the Playboy stationary, as reported with glee by the Daily Mail in Feb 2009.

“WH Smith would not be drawn on whether the decision to withdraw the Playboy merchandise was because of pressure.  A company spokesman said: ‘We continually review and update our range to offer our customers a wide range of products.  Each spring we renew our range of fashion stationery and as part of this update we have chosen to discontinue the Playboy range.’ ”  - Daily Mail Feb 09

It’s never good for a public limited company to admit to backing down to pressuregroups.

David Cameron threatens curbs on sexualisation of childhood as the ‘Bailey Review is published’. – June 2011

Bailey report

David Cameron with children’s minister Sarah Teather and Mothers’ Union chief executive Reg Bailey at No 10. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

What better proof of success for a campaign than the newly elected PM commissioning reports around the related issues?  Those school girls must be proud.

…or did the bunny brand simply go out of fashion?

The moral crusade against childhood sexualisation isn’t top of most parents’ agenda

Another article in The Guardian – this time questioning who’s agenda the anti bunny logo campaign served.

Remember what 14-year-old Tatiana said.  ”It’s porn innit? But people don’t think it’s porn. They think it looks nice.”

word-whores.blogspot.com

It’s not symbolic of pornography or the sexualisation of childhood to the children we’re so keen to speak up for on their behalf – because of course they don’t know any better.

Does the school girl buying this think…

I want to be a lap dancer when I grow up?                  or

I can’t believe I’ve been co-opted into the mainstreaming of soft porn?

Are they in fact activeknowledgeable and nuanced consumers, aware of the brands connotations, choosing to following a fashion trend the appeal of which has more to do with rebellion than sexualisation or sexism.

“(parents) have legitimate concerns regarding the connection between the omnipresent cultural wallpaper of sex and children’s wellbeing.” but what about the views of the child
Very little work has been done that takes into account young people’s views – and when they are included it’s usually in a limited fashion, responding to an adult-set agenda.

But didn’t the playboy campaign start with School Girls?  Well actually if you remember it was their Teacher ”Eleanor Kirwan who saw the Playboy stationery range next to Disney and Winnie the Pooh in WHSmith.  “I merely accompanied the pupils to their picket. They were present because they had made an informed and passionate choice.”  Informed by the teacher at Coloma convent girls’ school.  A highly selective Catholic school which has recently been criticised about the way it selects its students.  The more Catholic you can prove you are the better your chances.  So guess the demographic of the students and teachers.

Anyone who watched Poor Kids, Jezza Neumann’s powerful documentary about some of the 3.5 million British children living below the poverty line would have been prompted to ask whether sexualisation is indeed the most pressing harm facing our young people.  Of course, a social concern is not rendered benign because it is the least of the evils on offer. But this is a preoccupation favoured by the white middle classes who have the means to buy their way out and, on occasion, the inclination to use it as a method of policing other people’s parenting choices, and their taste.

There is deep disquiet among professionals that this crusade will end up cutting off young people from the sexual advice and support services they need.  …we owe it to ourselves and our children to interrogate whose agenda this serves and what that agenda is. It’s all too easy for legitimate, loving adult anxieties to be used as window-dressing for a far harsher and more insidious governmental moralism. – The Guardian June 2011

The logo enhanced products had their time in the sun and moved from being ‘fashionable‘ to being ‘tacky‘ and ‘chavy‘.  Ironically, it became childish, not ‘adult’.

Playboy returns to focus on its good old-fashioned routes.  Magazines and clubs.

As for WH Smiths???

They’re much more High Brow these days.

A starting point of the above lecture was from this RSA debate on Advertising in Society.

A key phrase that stuck with me which succinctly describes the trick advertisers pull is ‘Put value in your things not in yourself.’

Other links

Playboy founder uses social media site to tell the world his wedding with is off

Object cover up Ladmags in WH Smiths Paddington

OBJECT vs Former lads mags editor

The Wright Stuff on Lad Mags

Two feminists chew up an inarticulate WH Smith Manager

‘Sexualised children’ – is it always the media’s fault?

Challenge Three – Case Study

adbusters1

 image from adbusters.com

In today’s workshop we will be exploring a case study around Playboy and the Sexualisation of Childhood

The Task and Workshop

Advertising and the Media are often blamed for encouraging excessive consumerism, distorting our cultural values, commercialising and sexualising childhood, making us feel inadequate and insecure about ourselves, encouraging us to be unhealthy, encouraging us to get into debt as well as encouraging stereotypes and certain types of behaviour.

This week we want you to find an example of a piece of media, an advert, a company or organisation, a type of product, a celebrity or a country that you believe is being irresponsible in what it is promoting. This could be one of the above issues or from the ideas you explored in the first week.

You should then produce a case study about the example you have chosen that answers the following questions:

  • Who or what is it?
  • What is the problem or issue? How much impact does it have?
  • What is your evidence for the issue (remember- you need rock solid evidence if you are going to say something that is potentially libellous)
  • What is the solution to the problem? (is it a change in the law, is it getting the company to do something different, or is it a much bigger issue?)
  • How would the company or organisation defend their position?
  • What are the potential problems when taking this issue on (legal?, copyright?, libel?)
  • Have other creative practitioners dealt with this issue? If so how?
  • How could you, as a media practitioner, go about using your skills to highlight the issue to others- or to bring it to the attention of people who can resolve the issue?

You should then produce a pitch for a creative campaign that you believe will be effective at bringing this issue to people’s attention: this can be in any media (poster campaign, sticker campaign, advert, billboard, street performance, online etc etc). You should consider how your idea will create an impact and what the potential consequences are if you carried it out.

Once you have developed this, you should then produce a case study that answers the above questions and sells your creative pitch. This could be either:

a) a written case study and pitch

b) a video case study and pitch

c) an audio case study and pitch

Once you have done this please post to twitter with the #creativact hashtag

Some inspiration

Adbusters Media Foundation: Spoof Ad examples to give you an idea of some of the campaigns people have worked on in the past.

Listen to the Task

Challenge 3 – Case Study and Pitch by creativact

Week One Workshops – Finding the issues that matter to you and getting connected

During this weeks workshop you will be exploring the issues that matter to you and thinking about how you could make a difference to these with your creative skills. These might be issues that impact on you, a family member or friend, your community, your country or even worldwide issues.

We will start by doing a simple mind-mapping in your sketch books.

You should think about the following questions and start to write down your ideas that you would like to develop and explore over the course of the class:

  • What things would you like to see changed in the world?
  • What issues are important in the world right now?
  • What people/or community would you like to help for your project and why?
  • What things make you angry and why?
  • Do you know about any issues that you feel people need to know more about?
If you are stuck for inspiration read the news, or go and ask a friend these questions- get a sense of the issues that other people are concerned about.
Once you have found the areas you would like to work on you need to start thinking about how you are going to connect to these issues to understans.
  • Why is it important? Why should other people care? (What is the Context?)
  • Is there any research do you need to do to understand the issue better?
  • Are there any organisations or networks of people you could connect to (follow/join) that would be interested in the work you are doing?
  • What other people, artists, media practitioners have done work in this area?
During the second workshop- you should write a short blog post about the kind of work you are interested in doing and why you  so that other people can see what you are working on POST A LINK TO THIS POST ON THE COMMENTS BELOW. 
Once you have a good idea of what you would like to work on you are ready to start the first task Challenge One: Image Task