Psychogeography, Situationists and Ambient Media

Over the last few weeks we’ve been looking at a range of media in relation to activism including comedy, music, film, documentary and other art forms.

This week we are going to be thinking about the way in which other forms of activism can be used. This week’s task is to do a flash mob. But before we get on to that we are going to have a look at….

  1. Thinking around a term called Psychogeography
  2. Thinking around the work of Guy Debord and the Situationists
  3. The way in which those notions of psychogeography feeds into forms such as the flashmob.

Psychogeography

  • Psycho: Mind and Mental Processes
  • Geography: Study of Space in relation to Nature

Psychogeography- the relationship between what goes on in the mind and the places

Reading: Merlin Coverly Introduction extract from ‘Psychogeography’.

While reading it ask yourself the following questions:

  1. What is Psychogeography?
  2. What are the key aspects, and the purpose, of Psychogeography?
  3. What are the problems with it?

Guy Debord and the Situationists

A reading from Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography by Guy Debord

Derive Definition: 

 

The Theory of Derive

Case Studies

London Orbital by Ian Sinclair and Chris Petit- The M25 is replete with all these notions of power, exclusion, class with particular definitions of time.

New York Derive- ‘Every Harlot was a Virgin Once’ – A derive through New York

<iframe src=”http://player.vimeo.com/video/12083623″ width=”350″ height=”197″ frameborder=”0″ webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

Further Reading

Michel de Certeau – Walking in the City

This week’s task

This week’s task is the flashmob task

 

Week Seven – Memes, Viruses and Spreading Ideas Workshop

Memes and Viruses – Spreading Ideas Links from the workshop

Virus- A virus is a small infectious agent that can replicate only inside the living cells of organisms.

Meme - ”an idea, behavior or style that spreads from person to person within a culture.

This week we are thinking about memes and viruses and how ideas spread in our culture. Here are the links to readings from the talk.

Why Videos Go Viral- TEDTALK by Kelvin Allocca, YouTube Trends Manager

Rad to the Power of Sick 

An anthropological guide to YouTube – Michael Wesch

50 Greatest Virals on Current TV

Henry Jenkins- If it Doesn’t Spread it’s Dead – Meme’s and Viruses 

Douglas Rushkoff Readings on the Media Virus.

Week Seven Screening and Guest Podcast

The screening this week will be Resurrect Dead: The Mystery of the Toynbee Tiles

We also have a guest podcast from Matt Mason (Author of the Pirate’s Dilemma and Exec Director of Marketing at BitTorrent) discussing a number of issues around piracy, creative discruption, transmedia storytelling and social media. Essential listening for people looking to think through how they will become sustainable practitioners in the Creative Industries.

 

Week Seven Task- Challenge 6

This weeks task is a three week task that develops Challenge 6: Creating an Impact- with the challenge of producing a piece of media that actually makes some kind of impact in the world. This is your big task for the module where you can put all of your ideas and skills into making something happen.

Remember you also need to be doing Challenge 2, which is an ongoing task, where you are expected to post about your development process for the projects you are creating.

Further Resources

Remember to follow our Creative Activism Facebook and Creative Activism Twitter Feeds for inspiration, links and articles for this week’s task.

Some thoughts for next week

Please take a good look at the class schedule to find out more about what we will be covering next week.

Guest Workshop: Comedy, Satire and Change with James Cook, Comedian

jamescook

In this talk comedian James Cook explores the role of comedy as a part of public debate, as well as taking a look through how comedy has responded and reacted to politics and issues in society. He also talks through a few useful techniques to get you thinking about using comedy in your creative work.

You can find out more about James by following him on Twitter or check out the News With Jokes podcast series that he has created.

Here are the notes from the talk.

So we’ve heard that ideas change the world and that humour is an effective way to express an idea – so what if you had a political or social idea? How would you use humour to get that across?

When that happens it’s called ‘satire’- the holding up of vices, abuses and shortcomings to ridicule with the aim of shaming society and individuals into improvement.

In certain Native American cultures, there exists a role in society for part-shaman part-clown figures whose job is to ridicule everyone within their tribe, from the elders and chiefs to the little kids. It is agreed that this is their role, so no-one gets offended.

In the Hopi tribe, the ‘clown’ draws a circle on the ground and when inside the circle, they are given free rein to be as offensive as they like.

In our society, we have comedians who fulfil a similar role. Instead of drawing a circle on the ground, we have comedy clubs – where audience buy into the idea that anything and everything is fair game for ridicule.

The tools of satire…

Sarcasm –Saying something in such a way so that the viewer or reader understands that you don’t really mean it. ‘David Cameron is a REALLY good Prime Minister’

Parody – Mocking through impersonation, making the ‘subject’ (whether it’s a person, an institution or an idea) look ridiculous. In this example, The Day Today mocks US style news reports and the death penalty http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO9jGsgPTsk

Exaggeration – overstating the case to emphasise your point.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8v4adCJ0dM&feature=related

Juxtaposition – Take two seemingly unconnected ideas and put them together ‘what if x did y?’ For example, what if Ninjas had a parade? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49fVYmO3yv0&feature=fvsr

Comparison – Likening the subject to something else, usually in an unflattering way – but not always, sometimes to something unexpected or ridiculous. For example, Oprah Winfrey is like an Egyptian Pharoah.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkQBl-3t5sg

The Satire Boom!

In 1960, four recent Oxbridge graduates wrote and performed in a comedy sketch show called ‘Beyond the Fringe’ in London’s glamorous West End.

What was controversial about this show was that in it one of the performers, Peter Cook, did an impersonation of the then Prime Minister Harold MacMillan. And this had never been done on stage in Britain before. People would come from far and wide to see this amazing thing. Someone doing an impression of the actual Prime Minister live on stage.

And it wasn’t a flattering portrayal, Cook’s MacMillan was an elderly senile posh idiot way out of touch with reality. But this struck a chord with the public, because they thought that MacMillan WAS an elderly senile posh idiot way out of touch with reality.

The stage show led indirectly to the establishment of The Establishment Club, a nightclub in London where satirical revues were performed and every sacred cow was lampooned, from the army, to royalty, to politicians to the judiciary.

In 1961, part funded by Peter Cook, the satirical magazine Private Eye was founded, with the aim to mock the powerful, and in 1962 That Was The Week That Was – Britain’s first satirical television program went on air on BBC1 – at a time when there were only 2 television channels. Live on Saturday night TV, the members of the Conservative government were insulted – and sure enough in 1964 – Labour won the general election.

Satire had defeated the elderly, senile, posh, out of touch Tories.

Conclusive proof of the effectiveness of satire to change the world.

OR

The Conservatives had been in power for 13 years, which is usually when the electorate starts looking for alternatives.
AND they’d been rocked by the Profumo Affair
AND the ‘bounce’ being enjoyed by the recently elected leader of the Labour Party – Harold Wilson.

All of which would have happened had there been a ‘satire boom’ or not.

The Labour Party ‘won’ that election with a majority of 4.

A similar thing happened in the 80s. Margaret Thatcher and the Conservatives were the victims of satirical attacks from a new breed of exciting comedic talent. The likes of Ben Elton led the charge which started in the clubs of London and ended up on mainstream television.

Thatcher won three landslides, and was ultimately deposed by her own party – who then went on to win another election.

In 2011 Private Eye celebrated their 50th birthday. This was their front cover.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-snKk_lBC_Gs/TqkA3_z7EfI/AAAAAAAACjc/V1t1LMGaXl8/s1600/private%20eye%20happy%20birthday.jpg

So there you go – satire doesn’t work. But if satire doesn’t work, why do totalitarian regimes ban it?

Dario Fo once said:
“REAL satire causes outrage. The more they try and stop you – the better job you are doing”

So maybe REAL satire what causes outrage, like the 2001 Brass Eye Paedophile Special…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlEcGHxfltE

Among the press coverage of this ‘sick’ show, was this article in the Daily Star. Conveniently next to an article which featured the then 15 year old Charlotte Church…

http://screenagers.me/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/chestswell.jpg

Spitting Image was a television program that started in 1984 on ITV on Sunday nights, a mainstream station at a peak viewing time. The show consisted of comedy sketches performed by caricaturised latex puppets of the notable people of the day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhdHO5_HSQQ

In just 27 years we’d gone from no-one having ever impersonated the Prime Minister before, to the Prime Minister is a face eating alien. And that was 26 years ago – where can you go from there?

And what is the satirical point of that sketch? Which one of Thatcher’s policy is being lampooned?

Isn’t it ‘teasing’ rather than satire?

Teasing would be saying something like ‘David Cameron’s got a big face’, whereas satire would be to mock one of his policies. Which one do you think works best in front of a live audience?

I asked around a bunch of professional comedians and no-one can really remember the last time they saw anyone doing any political satire in their club sets. Why not? Is it that audiences don’t laugh as much at satire? Is it that audiences don’t want to hear it? Or is it that comedians are lazy?

Back in the early 60s Harold MacMillan went to see Peter Cook do the impression of him, and took it in ‘good humour’ and when the Home Secretary wanted to ban That Was The Week,  MacMillan said no. It is better to be ridiculed than ignored.

As can be seen in the rise to fame of Boris Johnson. An obscure opposition MP and former magazine editor, he achieved national notoriety for his appearances on Have I Got News For You. Often appearing as a bumbling fool. Here he is hosting in 2003. http://fliiby.com/file/704033/suwyq0twtf.html

He went on to be the Mayor of London.

With two weeks to go before the 2008 US election, both candidates did a ‘stand-up comedy routine’ at a dinner in New York City.  Here’s Obama (although McCain’s is probably funnier)  http://youtu.be/OSU-qAdcuyI

So now politicians are drawing a circle on the ground…

There is no evidence that any specific satirical piece, whether a book, a TV show, a film… has had any impact on specific political outcomes, although a healthy part of democracy is a population that questions, scrutinizes and in some cases, takes the piss, out of those in authority.

So it could be argued that satire’s REAL purpose is creating a culture where authority figures are questioned, which would be why there’s no North Korean Have I Got News For You.

Week 6: Comedy and Change: Social Balls

Isaac Newton was an English physicist, but in my mind he was also an unwitting sociologist.  His third law of motion states every action has an equal opposite reaction.

I see this as a metaphor for how society evolves and changes, with reactions to events, inventions and trends.

Stuff happens in our world on the whole as a reaction to something else.

The formation of the EDL was a response to a homecoming parade in Luton.

Punk -  a response to social / political unrest combined with the perceived failings of Hippie ideals.

The exploration of what makes an apple fall - as a reaction to said apple landing on ones head.

Women, why are you here?  Don’t you know that focusing attention to the development of you mind through education is detracting attention away from your womb - the very organ that makes you a woman?

Attendance at University endangers your reproductive system - and what man would take you for a wife, knowing your potential of bearing him children has been compromised?

But you know this - many esteemed medics have warned you of such reckless behaviour.  Yet still you persist - shame on you.

That was the common held view in the 19th C.  But attitudes change as ideas spread, become accepted and adopted.

Just as it was inconceivable for any self-respecting woman to ride a bike.

Stuff happens followed by a reaction to those happenings.  A wave hits the beach, and inevitably returns to the sea, through this process attitudes, opinions and ideas gradually shift.  Just as the shifting sands on the beach are moved by the waves.

One way ideas spread is through jokes, we as humans have a desire to amuse and be amused.  Many of us are motivated to entertain others, a good joke spreads rapidly, in part because of this motive.  When an idea stimulates a physical reaction – a laugh - it becomes emotive.  It is more likely to be remembered and passed on.  Jokes spread ideas.  It’s about engagement.  An idea can only live in the collective minds of those engaging with it.

Comedy is a powerful tool when you have a message to convey.  Or if you prefer…  If you have a message to convey how can you use comedy?

For a long time Orange have associated themselves with movies.

People like films, if we associate ourselves with want people like, they will like us.

Stella Artois attempted a similar association, with their Stella screenings and cinematic adverts.

The Orange campaign spreads the message that you the audience member have a responsibility to not allow a phone to spoil the film.  Orange make themselves out to be the good guys.  Or more accurately they are desperate to disassociate themselves with the reason why your cinema experience has been pissed on.

For more information on how to behave at the cinema - see here.

Through the above series of adverts Orange depicted themselves as ‘square‘ ‘suits‘ ‘corporate‘ commercialising the creative process and in turn ruining things.  Through the comic device of exaggeration, the deeper message is that Orange are capable of laughing at themselves.

Amusing, responsible, film loving Orange, jovial, self deprecating, promoter of creative expression Orange.  Not a faceless corporation but in fact the opposite of everything those suited executives featured represent.

Comedy in the UK has been enjoying it’s spot in the limelight over the past few years fulled in part by the BBC.  Mark Thompson took over as DG for the BBC in 2004 and announced the end of make-over shows.  Stand-up comedy is a similarly cheap way of filling air time.

Along comes a wave of new panel shows where jobbing comics are given a platform to broadcast their gags.  Creating a host of new faces to spread the cheer.  And these comics can be found everywhere…

…meanwhile companies such as Fosters adopt comics to draw interest to their products.

We have comics standing up everywhere, each trying to distinguish themselves from their peers.  Some have issues to raise - or perhaps use issues to hang their material on.  Others may try to stand out by being more offensive than their peers, and some have managed to become massively mainstream, in turn others make jokes about these extremes - reacting to current trends, just like the balls.

Read more here from Jack Harris’ blog.

Ideas are spread effectively through comedy, sometimes purposefully, sometimes accidentally, sometimes mistakenly.

These ideas live and procreate through the minds of their audiences, the more engaged the audience, the greater the potency of the idea.  The further reaching it’s effect.  Effects which in turn stimulate reactions.

As long as we continue to exist on this Pale Blue Dot of ours, the balls continue to swing.

Guest Lecture: Agitpop – Protest and Social Change in Popular Music – Chris Jury

agitpop banner

This week we are delighted to have Chris Jury (Broadcaster, Lecturer and Activist) present to us about his radio show called Agitpop- and sharing some of his work and reflections on pop and protest.

You can download the powerpoint slides here: Agitpop – Pop and Protest Creative Activism Coventry 6th Feb 2012 (ppt file) and if you would like to look at the tracklist that Chris discusses please find it here: Agitpop Programme Tracklists – ALL (word file).

And here is the recording from the talk:

If you would like to listen to the shows you can find them all on the Agitpop blog

Week 4 – Documentary and Video for Change

Documentary and Video For Change

This week, and next week, we will be exploring the role of video and documentary for social change: looking at a number of filmmakers, activists and advocacy groups who use documentary to make an impact and create social change. We have a number of guest podcasts and speakers this week to help you to think about this. The main focus of this week will be developing the practical tasks in the workshop as well as developing your ideas for Challenge 5: Documentary Task

But lets start with a few recent examples that were nominated for this years ‘Impact Award’ from Current TV, which rewards the films that have made the most social impact:

and here are some of the trailers and the impact that the films made:

The End of the Line (2009), the winner of the award, reveals the impact of overfishing on our oceans.

Impact Highlights:

  • Raised £6m to launch the Blue Marine Foundation, dedicated to creating a global network of marine reserves
  • Had significant impact on supermarket and consumer brands – from sandwich chain Pret A Manger to cat food brands Sheba and Whiskas all moving to use sustainably-sourced fish
  • Used as a strategic lobbying tool in both the UK and European parliaments to engage politicians in the issue of over-fishing

The Age of Stupid (2009). An archivist from the year 2055 looks back on footage to ask: why didnt we do anything about climate change while we still had the chance.

Impact Highlights:

  • Launched the 10:10 Global campaign in 46 countries, with over 100,000 individuals signing up alongside corporations and government departments, pledging to cut 10% of emissions
  • Launched the “Global Day of Doing” (10:10:10) coordinating over 7,000 local carbon cutting events in 188 countries
  • Raised almost £1m to sustain the 10:10 campaign

Burma VJ (2009). Using smuggled/undercover footage from Burma (a country that is ‘closed to the press’) this documentary tells the story of the 2007 protests by thousands of monks.

Impact Highlights:

  • With an estimated 30 million viewers, Burma VJ put the issue of Burma firmly on the international agenda
  • The ensuing political pressure helped bring about the release of Aung San Suu Kyi
  • Inspired a new generation of VJs and independent journalists within Burma

The Reckoning (2009) – Following the story of a prosecutor for the International Criminal Court attempts to enforce international laws against war crimes and genocide.

Impact Highlights:

  • The film team distributed, free of charge, screening kits to over 600 NGOs from 78 countries, to raise awareness of the International Criminal Court
  • Used extensively in education programmes including a 2-week ‘Teach the Reckoning’ workshop bringing together 700 educators from 70 countries representing a network of over 25,000 high school teachers
  • Used widely in Africa; it supported critical debate within the Kenyan judiciary and triggered an investigation into post-election violence

Trouble the Water (2008) – following the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in the USA

Impact Highlights:

  • Repeatedly used in strategic political campaigning; from raising a 20,000-strong letter campaign to the speaker of the House of Representatives, to strategic screenings at the national Democratic and Republican conventions
  • Triggered a major lobbying effort by 400 campaigners, including hurricane-survivors and supporters from across the country who travelled to Washington DC for training, advocacy and action.
  • Launched a “Share Your Story” campaign to gather hundreds of testimonies from constituents that were used to lobby policy leaders.

This week we want you to think about how you can use video and documentary to raise awareness of your creative activism projects, obviously we are not expecting you to be producing the above (many of these films have taken many years to come to fruition) but hopefully they will inspire you about the positive impact that media campaigners can make.

Week Four Workshops

Today’s workshop will focus on a practical task where you will be going out in the streets to ask people questions related to the Creative Activism work you are pursuing. We will also be developing your ideas for the Challenge 5 Documantary Task and we will be exploring how filmmakers use empathy in their work.

Week Four Screening

The screening this week will be a documentary film called Newspeak by Ken Fero, Migrant Media. Ken Fero will also be skyping in to the class to talk about his work. You can also check out Injustice, his award winning film from 2001.

Week Four Task/Challenge 5

This weeks task is Challenge 5: Documentary Task . This is a two week task that you will be developing in our week 5 workshop.

Remember you also need to be continuing work on Challenge 2, which is an ongoing task, where you are expected to post about your development process for the projects you are creating- and improving on your work in light of the feedback you have received.

Additional Tasks

Each week we will also be posting up an additional task for you to carry out. Find out about the week 4 additional tasks here.

In preparation for the work we are going to be looking at in a few weeks time on Digital Activism – this week we also want you to go to the guest lecture from Tessa Houghton which will be exploring Hacktivism and the recent Wikipedia Blackout – On Tuesday January 31st at 1.45pm in the ICE Building (it will also be made available online for those who cannot make it).

We also have an additional task this week for you to write a proposal for a Documentary that you think would contribute toward social change.

Further Resources

There will be a number of podcasts over the next few weeks related to using documentary and video for change. This includes a talk from Emily James, Director of the Documentary film called Just Do It, Sam Gregory from the video and human rights advocacy group called Witness and Charles Tsai from the Social Creatives. Please subscribe to our newsfeed to be informed when these go up. We will also let you know about these via our Creative Activism Facebook and Creative Activism Twitter Feeds.

It is also worth looking at these articles and sites to help shape your thinking:

Some thoughts for next week

Please take a good look at the class schedule to find out more about what we will be covering next week.

Week Three – Culture Jamming and Aesthetic Resistance

Barbie and G I Joe Liberation

Culture Jamming, Hoaxes and other ‘radical’ acts of aesthetic resistance

This week we will be exploring the work of a number of cultural and creative activists. Although some of these we cannot legally condone as acts that you should undertake for your projects(!) they are useful for our thinking around how practitioners can creatively act. We’ll start by looking at these 3 examples of ‘symbolic resistance’:

  1. Voice Box Action by the Barbie Liberation Organisation  some more on wikipedia
  2. Gay Background Characters in Simcopter Hack - Sabotage or Creative Act?
  3. Rosa Parkes

The Theory

“All that was once directly lived has become mere representation.” (Debord 1967: Thesis 1)

Guy Debord was a member of the Situationists International- a group of avant garde thinkers and artists set up in 1957 in Paris (coming out of a movement known as the Lettrist International). Their ideas were grounded in Marxism, and his analysis of the concepts of commodification(the turning of things into tradable goods), reification (giving things qualities they don’t innately have) and alienation (social estrangement from human nature). The issue being that we recognise worth and value in things not because of their use-value but because of their market value.

In 1967 Guy Debord published a book called Society of the Spectacle. The book is a series of 221 short theses that address the idea that we live in a Spectacle- where advanced capitalism commodifies our experience and perception of the world. Here’s some important points that the book sets out to make:

  • The Spectacle is a social relation of false consciousness mediated by images.
  • The Spectacle masks reality- we live through the proxy of the spectacle- and therefore masks degradation of human life through advanced capitalism.
  • The Spectacle becomes a substitute for the real.
Now this all seems very depressing- as if we are all victims of a power system that we cannot control or do anything about. But as we will see, there are ways that you can think through these ideas to imagine and create another reality.
The Situationists (and previously the Lettrists) wanted to challenge the spectacle, and so developed a number of theoretical and practical frameworks that are enormously useful for thinking through what interventions we might make as Creative Activists. Among these were ideas that we should critique the status quo of Urbanism (the urban way of living as the ideal of human existence) and the way we go about living our lives through the use of a range of ‘disruptive’ and ‘interruptive’ practices (including the situation, the derive (drift), psychogeography, detournement, recuperation and revolution to name a few).
We will be thinking through some of these in the coming weeks (especially when we are looking at Flash Mobs) but for now we will just focus on a few of these areas:

The Detournement

“turning expressions of the capitalist system against itself.”
Detournement is a useful concept that you will be using in this weeks task. Basically it consists of turning the symbolic realm back on itself- taking the signs of the spectacle and subverting their meaning through artistic and performed practice. It has inspired a number of movements including Punk, Culture Jamming and more recently Remix. It often involves mimicry and symbolic inversion.

Culture Jamming

Culture jamming is a form of protest in which media messages are transformed in humorous or disturbing ways to provoke insight. The term is used to cover practices such as hoaxing, spoofing, subvertising, guerilla advertising and graffiti art in an attempt to reclaim the flow and narratives of the mainstream media. The term was first coined in the mid 1980s by an experimental band called Negativeland- who used it to describe the act of rearranging messages on billboards. It was further described by Mark Dery in 1993 who used the term to refer to media hacking, information warfare, terror art and guerilla semiotics. It is often controversial and sometimes carried out through illegal means and therefore by anonymous collectives.

A number of campaign groups have used graffiti as a means to subvert the messages of advertising, early collectives include the Billboard Liberation Front (San Francisco) who describe themselves as marketeers for the people. You can see some of the ‘Billboard Corrections’ that they have carried out here. There is a similar group based in Australia called the Billboard Utilising Graffitiists Against Unhealthy Promotion (BUGAUP) who, throughout the 1980s, primarily targeted tobacco advertising, making a statement about the ethics of advertising the dangerous substance. Lots of groups continue to use graffiti, and associated methods such as sticker campaigns, to carry out their political and anti-corporate consent. If you are interested in looking further into graffiti as a means of dissent it is also well worth looking at the work of Banksy.

For information and resources around culture jamming a good resource to look at here is a publication called Adbusters: Journal for the Mental Environment

Adbusters is a network of artists, activists, students, educators and writers working on anti-consumerist and pro-environment campaigns against corporate media’s domination of the mental environment. They have launched a number of action-led campaigns including Buy Nothing Day, Digital Detox Week, More recently they have come to notoriety for their involvement in the Occupy Movement, that has led to demonstrations across the World.

They started out in Canada in 1988, when founders Kalle Lasn and Bill Schmaltz, appalled by an advert that effectively promoted the, for them, anti-environmental logging industry, set out to create an anti-ad aimed at dispelling the myths of that campaign. Their ad was refused airtime which, for them, showed that citizens didn’t have the same power as corporations in determining the truths and narratives that are prevalant in the media. Since then, they have been making spoof adverts and trying to get them into public advertising spaces. Although their relationship with the media continues to be rather antagonistic, with only a few broadcasters agreeing to air their anti-consumerist adverts. On September 13, 2004, Adbusters filed a lawsuit against six Canadian television broadcasters for refusing to air their work, the case continues…

Here’s some examples of their work:


and here’s a film they made called the Production of Meaning

Some more Culture Jammers

The Yes Men aim to raise awareness about what they consider problematic social issues. Through a process they call ‘identity correction’ where they impersonate ‘big-time criminals’ (read- corporations/organisations) in order to publicly humiliate them. They set up fake websites and then speak on behalf of those organisations including the WTO (World Trade Organisation) and many others. They have released two feature length films The Yes Men (2003) The Yes Men Fix the World (2009) – which we will be watching later today

Joey Skaggs (The Art of the Prank) - Stages Elaborate Hoaxes such as ‘Cathouse for Dogs‘ (a dog brothel) and ‘Celebrity Sperm Bank’ (a fake auction for rockstar sperm). Joey Skaggs has very kindly agreed to be this weeks guest podcaster for the class- and we will post up his talk later on this week.

Reverend Billy Talen and the Church of Earthelulah - a radical choir singing about the ‘devil’ of consumerism (they visit shopping malls and preach anti-consumerism).

 

Recuperation

Recuperation is the opposite of detournement. It refers to the act of when ‘mainstream’ culture reclaims subversive acts, ideas and works- and packages it back up as a ‘safe’ commodity or idea. This is often seen when cultural styles (such as the DIY aesthetics of Punk) become incorporated into the thing they were trying to criticise (so you can buy ripped jeans for example). Fashion is notorious for doing this but so are a number of other areas where rebellion and radical thinking are basically incorporated and controlled through the aesthetic realm. Subversion therefore becomes style, rebellion gets packaged back to us (think of the way the famous Che Guevara image is now incorporated back into mainstream). The spectacle must regain control to maintain the social order.

Naomi Klein, in her book ‘No Logo’ points out that culture jamming can sometimes appear to be authentic, when in fact it is entirely set up by the brands who work with culture jammers to effectively produce anti campaigns. What appears to be authentic resistance can in fact be orchestrated marketing (astroturfing)- and such campaigns can end up resulting in enormous publicity for the brands that only go to reinstate their values. This is Recouperation at play.

Here’s an interesting example from Levis- a banned advert following the UK 2011 Summer Riots- that focuses around the symbols of rebellion:

and here’s the same advert being (re)detourned:

The riots in the UK are particularly interesting when considering issues of consumerism! (much of the looting revolved around the taking of branded sports clothing)

Week Three Workshops

Today’s workshop will expand on some of the ideas in the class- thinking about Remix, Juxtaposition, Allegory and Metaphor so that you can develop your ideas for the  4th challenge: the Remix and Subversion task.

Week Three Screening

The screening this week will be a documentary film called The Yes Men Fix The World - exploring some of the techniques of a group of political activists who use ‘Identity Correction’ to impersonate big corporations and organisations.

Week Three Task/Challenge 3

This weeks task is Challenge 4: Remix and Subversion Task

Remember you also need to be doing Challenge 2, which is an ongoing task, where you are expected to post about your development process for the projects you are creating.

Additional Tasks

Each week we will also be posting up an additional task for you to carry out. Find out about the week three additional task.

Further Resources

This week we have broadcaster and academic John Mair discussing the importance of getting your facts straight when embarking on a campaign

There will also be a guest podcast from artist and prankster Joey Skaggs talking about his work.

If you’d like to find out more about Marxist ideas around the commodity – David Harvey’s Reading Marx’s Capital Class will be well worth your time.

Remember to follow our Creative Activism Facebook and Creative Activism Twitter Feeds for inspiration, links and articles for this week’s task.

Some thoughts for next week

Next week we will be exploring the role of Video and Documentary Filmmaking as a Tool for Activism. Please take a good look at the class schedule to find out more about what we will be covering next week.

Week Two – Advertising, Media, Power and Our Mental Environment

adbusters1

    

What do you think about the ideas in this short ‘thought bubble’?

Our Media Consumption in the UK

We live in an intensely mediated age: what the Situationist, Guy Debord, termed ‘The Society of the Spectacle’ (1967). We will come back to Guy Debord next week when we start to look at media tactics in more detail.

In the UK the average media consumer’s digital day is seven hours and five minutes – almost half (45%) of people’s waking day is spent consuming some kind of media (television, internet, print etc). With the average UK 16-24 year old cramming 9.5 hours of media into 6.5 hours of consumption per day through multitasking (2010 – Ofcom Report). In fact, contrary to popular belief, even more traditional forms of media consumption are on the rise.

A vast amount of the income derived from much of this media is through advertising (selling your eyeballs to brands and organisations) – making the advertising industry worth more than £16.7 Billion A Year (this is a figure for ‘display advertising’ alone and therefore doesnt include other, more blurry forms of advertising such as PR) and giving them a massively significant role in determining what that media might be.

Media Effects

A number of academics have studied the intense effects of this environment on our attitudes and behaviour, our mental health, the way we see ourselves, our desires and even the way we relate to each other. Such studies have led to a number of changes- concerning the selling of dangerous products such as Tobacco and Alcohol and there are strict regulations particularly when it is concerning vulnerable people such as children. A famous example of one of these studies is the Payne Fund Studies that looked at the effect of films on childrens behaviour . A number of theories have emerged from this:

Catharsis Theory: That the media acts as a kind of channel for us to vent our own frustations- so by watching violence on TV or playing violent computer games for example, we are much less because it helps us to release our frustations and desires to carry out those acts. This theory therefore argues that the media has a postive effect.

Aggressive Cues Theory argues that exposure to violent stimuli in the media increases our psychological and physical arousal around these acts. Therefore increasing our chances of behaving in certain ways.

Observational Learning Theory takes this a stage further and is related to the way we are positioned in terms of the act we are being exposed to. So for example if we can relate to the character we are more likely to see their behaviour as normal. So if we are taught to be scared by a certain situation then we will potentially observationally learn to experience that situation in the same way.

Reinforcement Theory goes against the above in that it argues that we already come to view the media with in a preconceived way- and that the media merely reinforces our views that we already have. So if we already have certain attitudes- seeing media portrayals that support our attitudes will merely reinforce our opinions and actions. This will be to do with our background.

Cultivation Theory argues that the symbolic realm of television actually shapes our conception of the world, our values and our attitudes toward certain people (through media portrayals such as stereotyping). That we come to believe in the reality of the media- we come to believe in the symbolic reality that the media portrays and this determines our very consciousness. (ie- our notions of beauty and the perfect body, our insecurities)

Advertising obviously wants to play on these deep psychological fears (as we will see later in this weeks screening of Century of the Self) because they can often, and conveniantly, be resolved through consumption. Here’s another ‘thought bubble’:

 

Media and Power

The ownership and control of the media (and therefore the way it is funded) arguably makes a significant impact on the narratives and ideologies we experience as ways to live our lives by.

The Propaganda Model- 5 Biases

Noam Chomsky and Edward S Herman (1988) in their book Manufacturing Consent analyse how the media creates ‘Propaganda’- necessary illusions to reduce the general public to consent and control. Out of this book they developed the propaganda model which describes five editorially-distorting filters applied to news reporting in mass media:

  1. The Size, Ownership, and Profit Orientation: The media must serve the interests of making profit for their owners. The tendancy therefore is for few big firms to develop into conglomerates (for business purposes: it makes sense in terms of economies of scale etc). This is visible across a number of media- ie News International and the Murdoch Empire, Technology companies such as Microsoft and Google)
  2. Advertising: They must cater to the economic interests of their revenue streams. Therefore the interests of advertisers have a tendancy to become the dominant narratives, the dominant fears.
  3. Sourcing Mass Media News: they argue that “the large bureaucracies of the powerful subsidize the mass media, and gain special access, by their contribution to reducing the media’s costs of acquiring [...] and producing, news. Because news is so dependant on PR and celebrity, in order to reduce the costs of acquiring content, the news becomes PR and Celebrity- an issue explored in Starsuckers. Those who fail to fall into this bias will find it harder to get access tio the news.
  4. Flak and the Enforcers: Corporations have great social, financial and assets and resource at their disposal to set up ‘flak machines’ to manage public information and to discredit true information. You might argue that this type of behaviour has been apparent in the recent Leveson Enquiry
  5. Anti-Communism: One function of the dominant news media was to undermine the ideas around other forms of social organisation, such as communism/socialism- to reinforce the political organisation of free market capitalism. Bear in mind the book was published in 1988, just a few months before the fall of the Berlin wall.

Two Provocations:

1. The first one is a manifesto written by arts academics at our own Coventry School of Art and Design way back in 1964 - an early artistic intervention on the issues of advertising.

2. In 2007 the Brazilian City Sao Paulo became the first city outside of the communist world to put a near blanket ban on outdoor advertising in its “Lei Cidade Limpa” or Clean City Law:

“The Clean City Law came from a necessity to combat pollution … pollution of water, sound, air, and the visual. We decided that we should start combating pollution with the most conspicuous sector – visual pollution.” – Mayor Gilberto Kassab

Watch this video and have a think about what the motivation was for this?

Further work

Another useful idea to look into, if you’d like to explore questions around power in more detail, is Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci’s ideas around cultural hegemony. Looking at the way dominant groups in society maintain their position of power through a negotiated consent and how the working class comes to accept the ‘common sense’: the norms, values and morals of the ruling elite.

Week Two Workshops

Today’s workshops will focus on researching Case Studies and exploring the question: How significant is advertising in determining our values? What tactics do they use and how can we learn from these for our Creative Activism campaigns?

Week Two Screening

The screening this week will be a documentary film by Adam Curtis called Century of the Self (2002). It is a four part series examining the impact and effect of Sigmund Freud’s theories- looking at the way these ideas have influenced advertising, political power and social control. We will watch the first part in class, but if you would like to watch the rest of it you can find it here.

Week Two Task/Challenge 3

This weeks task is Challenge 3: Producing a group case study and pitch related to advertising, persuasion and power.

Challenge 2 is an ongoing task where you are expected to post about your development process for the projects you are creating. We will discuss what you need to do here in today’s workshop.

Additional Tasks

Each week we will also be posting up an additional task for you to carry out. Find out about the week two additional Task

Further Resources

This week we have Writer and Activist John Jackson talking to the the class about his book ‘Small Acts of Resistance- with some use tips for Creative Activists

In November 2011, the RSA brought together a panel to discuss Advertising in Society: What’s the Deal? – have a listen to the podcast.

Remember to follow our Creative Activism Facebook and Creative Activism Twitter Feeds for inspiration, links and articles for this week’s task.

Some thoughts for next week

Next week we will be looking at some responses to advertising from cultural activists. Please take a good look at the class schedule to find out more about what we will be covering next week.

Week One – Introduction to the Creative Activism Class

Creativity, in many ways, is always about change

Here’s one definition from dictionary.com

 

the ability to transcend traditional ideas, rules, patterns,relationships,

or the like, and to create meaningful new ideas, forms, methods, interpretations, etc.; originality, progressiveness, or imagination: the need for creativity in modern industry; creativity in the performing arts

What we mean by Creative Activism in this class?

In the context of this class, we are using the term ‘Creative Activism’ to describe the role of creativity in the process of advocating for social and cultural causes and change. We will therefore be addressing the way that Activists and Changemakers have approached:

  • Issues such as human rights (the right to free speech, the right to a fair trial, workers rights, right to be educated, health rights).
  • Issues and injustices around inequalities (in gender, sexuality, race, class and ability for example).
  • Global issues (poverty, environmentalism, health etc)
  • Issues around Power (abuses and inequalities in media, government, corporations for example)
  • As well as a whole host of issues that are related to these

The projects that you work on can take place at a local level (where you might argue for something to be changed or addressed locally- such as better disabled access to city centres, better representation on issues that matter to you) or at a national and international level (you might choose to support a charity or advocacy group campaigning around poverty). There are many groups that you could get involved with and we will be posting links up to some good places where you can find these over the few weeks.

We will be exploring a number of creative approaches to activism: artists producing provocative work to encourage debate and reflection, writers and poets who use their talents to engage people in looking at issues in new ways, comedians addressing issues through humor and satire, documentary filmmakers bringing an issue into the limelight through capturing important stories – the list goes on.

What we’ll be doing?

Over the next 10 weeks we will be exploring how professional and amateur campaigners, artists and media practioners from a range of disciplines have used creative approaches and methodologies to bring about justice for their causes and to make important issues come to public attention. We will be exploring terms and approaches such as culture jamming, guerilla marketing, digital methodologies, tactical media through a number of different areas including in on the web, filmmaking, music, photography and design.

Alongside this exploration, we will be considering how we, as media creators (artists, filmmakers, photographers – however you see yourselves), can use these approaches and methodologies to help your own work have wider significance and impact. As part of this exploration there will be a series of tasks and challenges for you to carry out so that you can put into practice some of the ideas that you develop over the course of the class.

Where possible we are hoping that your work will actually help and support real causes that are out there in the world. This might be an issue in your community, it might be supporting a cause you feel strongly about or even producing content as part of a group you are already connected to – its up to you.

Sharing, feedback and getting your work noticed

We will also be encouraging you to share your ideas and knowledge with each other through the use of the #creativact hashtag: which you should use every time you blog, post a video or photograph or find an interesting link that you want to share with the class. Remember you are posting these up into places like vimeo and flickr where others can find it – so it also might be worth you using the ‘description’ box to say what you were trying to achieve (and the context of your project) in case other people outside of the class stumble across it and want to know more about it. And remember – if you are happy for others to benefit from your work you can license it under an appropriate creative commons license (flickr and vimeo allow you to select which license you want). You might also want to post the work into other places to help it have a bigger impact (such as to forums and sites in your ‘activist’ community) – we will be encouraging you to do this with all of the tasks. Remember- part of the objective of this class is also to encourage you to develop your networks.

You should also be looking at the work of others on the course- encouraging each other with constructive feedback and advice so that we can all learn from each other. There is a lot of knowledge in our community and it would be great if we all could help to maximise each others potential with it. Remember to tweet your work, or post it to the facebook page, so that others can find it.

Week One Workshops

Today’s workshops will involve us starting to think about the causes and issues that you would like to focus on- thinking about the issues that matter and impact upon you and how you can start to get connected to these through your creative work.

Week One Screening

Each week we will have a screening or guest podcast to help you develop your

The screening this week will be a documentary film by a UK filmmaker, Chris Atkins, called Starsuckers. The film explores the relationship between the Celebrity, the PR industry and the News Media and how this has far reaching consequences. There is also an additional task you can do related to this screening.

Week One Task/Challenge

Every week there will be a task that you will be working on. Some of these will be individual tasks and with some of them you will be able to do them as part of a group. As you will see from the schedule, some of the tasks will last for one week and some of them will be for a few weeks. Toward the end of the class there is a group task for the whole class (where you will be doing a flash mob for charity!).

Find out about this weeks Task: Challenge One- Image Task: Provoking Truths With Imagery

Challenge 2 is an ongoing task where you are expected to post about your development process for the projects you are creating.

Additional Tasks

Each week we will also be posting up an additional task for you to carry out. This week you have a choice of two short analysis tasks.

Further Resources

Follow our Creative Activism Facebook and Creative Activism Twitter Feeds for inspiration, links and articles

Please take a look at our Reading List for the Creative Activism Course for books and texts that will provide you with some creative inspiration and introduce some of the theoretical frameworks we will be exploring on the module.

Some thoughts for next week

While you are working on this weeks tasks you will also need to be thinking about what we will be looking at over the next few weeks so you can start to research and develop your ideas. Please take a good look at the class schedule to find out more about what we will be covering.

Remember to have fun and be creative- we want to encourage you to experiment and take risks, and to challenge yourself to do new things in your work.

 

Lectures, Workshops and Creative Tasks

During the class we will be developing a number of lecturescreative tasks and workshops exploring the potentials of creative activism. This includes lateral thinking sessions, the development of creative strategies and their fruition into media interventions that will hopefully create an impression, raise awareness and have some kind of impact on an issue you feel strongly about.

The aim is for these tasks to build into a portfolio of work for our participants (which includes using video, web, writing, photography, digital and social media, ambient media and so on) to enable you to connect in a real way to a social, political or cultural issues that you believe in.

Even more importantly though: this project is about you building a network of inspiration and connections to like-minded individuals who you can collaborate with to share experiences, resources, knowledge and skills.

If you have any ideas or you’ve been inspired by a particular artist, activist or project , then please let us know. Even better, if you would like to donate a lecture or talk to the class, then please get in touch.